Somewhere, somebody’s counting the hours.
The second movie based on Stephenie Meyer’s blockbuster
Twilight saga is coming out soon. Chatter has increased on all things related to it: what the stars are like; whether or not the vampire stories are ok for Christians to read, much less enjoy; and why people like them so much. And boy, do they like them. Approve of the series or not, it’s indisputable that
Twilight fever has gripped America’s female population.
Compared to
Twilight, a totally different sort of book sits on my reading stack:
Letters to Alice on First Reading Jane Austen, by Fay Weldon. Originally published in 1984, it was loaned to me by a friend, and as an Austen fan, I’m enjoying it. My reading came to a hard stop on page 13 when I read:
Cover via Amazon
The other books [not Austen's]…are thrillers and romances, temporary things. …[The] characters exist for the purposes of plot, and the books they appear in do not threaten the reader in any way; they do not suggest that he or she should reflect, let alone change…. And because they don’t enlighten, they are unimportant. (Unless , of course, they are to be believed, when they become dangerous. To believe a Mills & Boon novel reflects real life, is to live in perpetual disappointment. You are meant to believe while the reading lasts, and not a moment longer.)Mills & Boon novels, by the way, are like category-length romances. And though I can guess her feelings, the author leaves her opinions about inspirational novels to the imagination, whether “thrillers [or] romances,” despite the fact that they sometimes come with discussion questions and Bible studies.
But to expect that any novel “reflects real life” is, as Weldon states, a danger, especially if a person allows her views to be formed by fiction, romance or not. I’ve read plenty of literature which enlightened and challenged me, yet also depressed me. I would not want to coexist with some of the characters invented by almost every college-taught novelist I’ve read.
I am not arguing, by the way, that
Twilight can or cannot “enlighten,” or is or isn’t “unimportant.” I will not get into that discussion here. But since reading that statement of Weldon’s, I've thought about how women's (and girls') views of men and marriage are shaped by romance novels, and it’s recently been a hot topic of discussion over on Inkwell Inspirations. I can’t help but wonder about the subject in light of the phenomenon that is
Twilight, which is arguably the most popular book series among females today. The universe of human Bella Swan, her vampire-love Edward Cullen, and her werewolf friend Jacob Black is a fun place to visit. But if the characters are believed outside of the novel (and here I mean their essences, their characteristics, not their states as mythical characters like vampires), as Weldon says, disappointment looms.
I should note that Jacob the werewolf has his fans too, but right now I want to look at Edward, Twilight’s vampire hero.
Image by Ezyan Y. via Flickr
Why is Edward so popular? Well, he’s smart, handsome, brooding (get a load of that intensity!) and he chooses to do the hard thing in order to do what’s right. He doesn’t “want to be a monster” (187) so he feeds on animal blood instead of humans’. He’s a guy with a conscience and a (metaphoric) heart.
Another appealing thing about Edward is his love for Bella. He is so attuned to her that he knows what she needs (encouragement, a loving touch to her cheek, or a hand-crafted meal). Always. He spends 24 unsleeping hours a day devoted to her. Among a few other faults, he’s seriously overprotective, but I think many girls, perhaps left emotionally or physically undefended by the men in their lives, might find that a desirable trait rather than a negative one. Edward doesn’t cheat, abuse or shame like some real-life boyfriends or daddies.
He has great lines. He says, “You are the most important thing to me now. The most important thing to me ever” (273). He compliments her wardrobe: “I’m very partial to that color with your skin” (320). He promises to stay with her forever (498). What girl doesn’t want that?
I think females are attracted to Edward because in being moral, protective, faithful, and totally in love with Bella, he’s practically the epitome of “perfect love,” which is something we all yearn for.
Romance writer Lori Lundquist is writing a thought-provoking series on how
Twilight brought her closer to Jesus, and she gave me permission to quote her: “The attraction is born out of our DNA. We all crave a perfect love because we were made by the Perfect Love. Humans, created by the Creator, God Almighty, are designed to love, because He is love, and also to be loved perfectly by Him. We read and write fairy tales, consciously or sub-consciously, because of the proverbial God-shaped hole in our souls.” (October 26, 2009, www.lorilundquist.blogspot.com)
Perfect love has only ever been found in one man, Jesus. No matter how wonderful or rotten the men in our lives have been, Jesus alone will never let us down or abandon us. He is the only One who can save us, restore us, and bring ultimate healing to our hearts. He is Right, protective, and totally in love with us.
This does not mean that love between a man and a woman isn’t godly. Christian marriage is one way Jesus has given us to experience, understand, and reflect His love.
“The bond and covenant of marriage was established by God in creation, and our Lord Jesus Christ adorned this manner of life by his presence and first miracle at a wedding in Cana of Galilee. It signifies to us the mystery of the union between Christ and his Church, and Holy Scripture commends it to be honored among all people…. The union of husband and wife in heart, body and mind, is intended by God for their mutual joy; for the help and comfort given one another in prosperity and adversity; and when it is God’s will, for the procreation of children and their nurture in the knowledge and love of the Lord…”(
Book of Common Prayer, 423).
When we look to a man to be near-perfect like Edward, however, Weldon’s point about believing fiction only while you're reading it holds. It could be dangerous for a reader to compare Edward (or Mr. Darcy, Romeo, or any other fictional hero) to the real men in her life, holding him up as a standard of masculinity. If a woman or girl thinks her husband (present or future) will be as intuitive, affectionate, and slavishly devoted to her as Edward is to Bella, she’ll be disenchanted, fast. One bout of your husband suffering the stomach flu ought to do this trick.
Not to say that my husband doesn’t have any of Edward’s qualities. He’s cute, smart, and thoughtful. But I can’t read his mind, I get tired, and I selfishly want my way sometimes. If I can’t be everything to him, why should I expect the same from him?
As much as I may want my husband to be able to read my mind when I want a shoulder massage, what I really want is for his life to be devoted to God. No human man's existence is supposed to be entirely all about their women, as Edward's is with Bella. Edward’s “perfect love” for her is, after all, fictional, a pale imitation of the Perfect Love that is Jesus.
Perhaps you’ve never had an issue confusing real-life men with fictional ones, but have you ever compared a character to someone you know? Have you ever tried to take specific lessons from characters to apply in your own life? (For example, "I want to be more attentive to my spouse in the little things, like Edward is to Bella.") Do you think fiction can inspire or enrich you this way?